Nine Yards, Western Eyes: A Photo Series on the Sari

Made in winter 2023 for VIS 135 — Design Research Methods — during my senior year. The project was a photographic series examining the over-sexualization of the sari by the Western gaze and the act of reclaiming it. All photographs are my own. The images are embedded throughout — the text on them is part of the work.

View Project

The sari is not a costume. It is not exotic. It is not an invitation.

It is, at its most literal, a length of unstitched fabric — somewhere between five and nine yards depending on the region, the tradition, the drape. At its most expansive, it is a living archive: of craft, of regional identity, of the particular intelligence required to wrap a single piece of cloth around a body in dozens of distinct ways, each with its own name, its own occasion, its own history. The Nivi drape is not the Gujarati drape is not the Kodagu drape is not the Bengali drape. The sari does not have one form. It has hundreds, and each one carries the weight of the community that developed it.

What the Western gaze did to the sari was collapse all of that into a single image: the midriff. The flash of skin between blouse and drape, which in the context of the garment is incidental — a consequence of how fabric moves around a body — became, through colonial and post-colonial projection, its defining feature. Suddenly nine yards of fabric weren't enough. The abundance, the layering, the deliberate coverage all became invisible, and what remained in the Western imagination was a sliver of exposed skin, read as invitation rather than as the natural behavior of cloth.

This project was a response to that flattening. The formal choice — close-up photography of fabric, hands, and drapes without faces, overlaid with text — was deliberate. Keeping faces out of frame refuses the gaze a point of entry. There is no figure to objectify, no expression to read, no body to assess. What remains is the fabric itself: its texture, its weight, its folds, the particular way a hand adjusts the pallu. The intimacy is there, but it belongs to the garment and the wearer, not to the viewer.

The text on the images carries the argument the photographs make visually. Yards of fabric weren't enough to cover the body from unwanted western eyes. A flash of skin was akin to baring it all. Objectification and abuse traumatized traditional drapes into assimilating. These are not captions — they are indictments, embedded in the images themselves so that the critique and the subject cannot be separated. And the final page: Re-adjusting the pallu. Rejecting the gaze. Redefining. Three actions, in that order, because reclamation is not a single gesture. It is ongoing. It is as routine as fixing a drape that has slipped.

The research behind the project drew from scholarship on diaspora, femininity, and the colonial reinterpretation of South Asian dress — the way British imperialism didn't just affect governance and economy but reached into the most intimate registers of culture, including what women wore and how their bodies were read by others. The sari's association with backwardness, with tradition-as-stasis, with the body as spectacle rather than as the wearer's own — none of these readings were native to the garment. They were imposed, and then, over generations, internalized to varying degrees.

What interests me most about the sari as a subject is that reclamation doesn't require abandonment of tradition. The reinvention of the sari — new fabrics, new draping styles, new contexts — is not a rejection of what came before. It is the garment doing what it has always done: adapting, holding, covering, revealing exactly as much as the wearer chooses. The living art form survives not despite its simplicity but because of it. A length of unstitched fabric has no fixed meaning. It becomes what you make it. That is its resilience, and it has always belonged to the women who wear it.